By Joe DuPont, Clearwater Region Fishery Manager, IDF&G
There certainly has been a lot of discussion lately about what this year’s spring Chinook Salmon runs may be like. So, I have provided the table below that shows the preseason forecast for runs returning to the Clearwater Region.
This forecasts was developed using last year’s Jack returns, and I emphasize that this is only a forecast. Some years our forecasts are way off, and some years they are fairly close. If you are wondering how this forecast compares to previous year’s returns, refer to the two graphs below that show the number of adults (2 and 3-ocean fish) that made it past Lower Granite Dam over time.
You will see that for the Clearwater River basin we are forecasting a run (forecast in shown by the yellow circle) similar to what we have seen from 2008 to 2012 where we had 7-day a week fisheries and seasons that lasted into June if not later. The forecasted return for the Rapid River run fish is more than double last year’s return but not as high as we experienced in 2010 and 2011. In the past, runs of this size resulted in 7-day a week fisheries that lasted into June. Chinook Salmon rules will be set on March 19-20 by the Commission, and rule proposals for the Commission will be developed with input from the public.
Now that I have your attention, I wanted to let you all know the dates and locations for when we will be having our public meetings this year where we will discuss the this year’s spring Chinook Salmon run for the Clearwater Region and how to best structure our fishery around it. During these public meetings, we will also present some of the new things we are learning in the Clearwater River Basin and what we are doing to improve salmon runs there. We will also give you an update on access issues on the Little Salmon River and what we are doing about it. Finally, we will discuss last year’s Chinook Salmon season, what we did about it and what we could do differently in the future. These public meetings will occur as follows:
February 25, 2014 6:00 PM (Mountain Time) Riggins Salmon Rapids Lodge
February 26, 2014 6:00 PM (Pacific Time) Lewiston IDFG Regional Office
February 27, 2014 6:00 PM (Pacific Time) Orofino Clearwater Hatchery
I hope to see you at one of these meetings. For those of you who can’t make it, we will provide you opportunities to comment via e-mail. Stay tuned for these e-mails.
Finally, I wanted to share the article below with all of you that Eric Barker wrote last week for the Lewiston Tribune. The IDFG regularly provides comments to Washington and Oregon on concerns we have with how they manage their Chinook fisheries. This article does a good of showing how difficult it can be at times for changes to occur. Idaho will continue to work with these States on ways to manage their fisheries so it will better meet the needs of all.
Idaho's chinook plea denied by neighbor states
Oregon, Washington allow for spring fishing season to carry on as usual
Posted: Friday, January 31, 2014 12:00 am
By ERIC BARKER of the Tribune
Idaho was rebuffed after asking its neighbors to the west to delay fishing for spring chinook in the lower Columbia River so more of them can reach the Salmon and Clearwater rivers.
Ed Schriever, chief of fisheries for the Idaho Department of Fish and Game, addressed senior fisheries managers from Oregon and Washington at a meeting Wednesday in Vancouver, Wash., in which the two states set fishing regulations for the Columbia.
Idaho has long held that lower Columbia River fishing seasons in March and April disproportionately harvest fish bound for hatcheries on Idaho's Rapid and Clearwater rivers. Those fish are among the first spring chinook to enter the Columbia each year, and Schriever said anglers there catch many more of them than they do of other stocks of spring chinook.
For example, he said, juvenile chinook released from Rapid River account for about 11 percent of the adult hatchery chinook that return to the Columbia each year. But they make up 30 percent of the harvest in the lower Columbia. Conversely, he said, there are other hatcheries that account for 40 to 50 percent of the smolts released in the basin but make up less than 10 percent of the adult harvest in the Columbia.
He also noted that harvest in the Columbia can curtail fishing opportunity and harvest in Idaho. Between 2008 and 2012 he said 40,000 Rapid River-bound fish were harvested in the lower Columbia, but Idaho sport anglers harvested just 26,000 fish during the same period.
"Our request of Oregon and Washington is to get a framework in place that more evenly distributes their catch target across all the stocks and not disproportionately on the earliest arriving," he said.
Specifically, Idaho would like the two states to hold off on allowing fishing above the Interstate 5 Bridge until May. But that would not be a popular move. Anglers, guides and retailers in the lower Columbia are zealous about starting to fish in March, when low and clear water is most conducive to catching spring chinook.
Tony Nigro of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and Guy Norman of the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife listened to Shriever's explanation of Idaho's concerns. But they were not compelled to make adjustments. Instead, they approved a lower Columbia fishing season that will open in March that is designed to harvest the two states' share of fish by April 7.
Norman and Nigro also noted the two states have adopted a 30 percent buffer to guard against overharvest. Fisheries in the lower Columbia are designed based on preseason run-size predictions. Those predictions are often wrong. In the past, when the forecasts have been more robust than the actual returns, the two states have harvested more fish than they otherwise would have been allowed.
Based on protests from Idaho and tribes that fish on the Columbia River, Oregon and Washington now set their harvest rates 30 percent lower than the run forecast would otherwise call for.
Norman said the 30 percent buffer helps distribute the lower Columbia catch over a longer time frame.
"I don't want that buffer to be taken for granted," Nigro said.
Schriever said he appreciated the Oregon and Washington listening to him, but he didn't buy their argument and said even with a buffer they are targeting the early returning fish bound for Rapid River and the Clearwater.
"How does that not continue to target the front end of the run?" he said. "So I asked for their consideration and they gave me none."
Allen Thomas of the Vancouver Columbian contributed to the reporting of this story.